How does MARI and POL reserve life compare?

In the oil and gas sector, the longevity of reserves is a critical measure of a company’s future sustainability and profitability.

When comparing MARI and Pakistan Oilfields Limited (POL), it becomes evident that MARI is in a far more advantageous position concerning its reserve life.

MARI’s Strategic Edge

As of June 2024, MARI’s estimated reserve life stands at a robust 17 years.

📢 Announcement: We're Moving to Discord – Join Us There! 

Hi everyone! 👋

To improve your experience and offer additional features, we’re moving our community from WhatsApp to Discord!

Here’s what you’ll get on Discord:

✅ Research Reports Channel – Access a regularly updated compilation of valuable research reports
✅ PSX24/7 Bot – Ask anything about the PSX and get instant insights powered by KSEStocks historical data
✅ Organized Channels – Separate spaces for discussions, news, reports, and more
✅ Better Notifications – Control what you see and when
✅ Smoother Interaction – Easier to follow and participate in conversations
✅ Organized trading ideas - trading ideas that you can discuss and keep track of

Join now 👉 https://discord.gg/kST9hWjS

This means that at the current production levels, MARI can continue to extract hydrocarbons from its existing reserves for nearly two decades.

This longevity is a result of MARI’s strong performance in increasing its reserve base.

Over the past year, MARI has seen a substantial 17% growth in its gas reserves.

Don't miss:

• Which cars are driving the rally in auto stocks?
• Is DGKC going to Rs. 240?
• Why TPLP could go higher.

This expansion has not only extended its reserve life but also fortified its position as a major player in the industry.

On the other hand, POL’s reserve life tells a different story.

POL’s reserves are projected to last only about 7 years, significantly shorter than MARI’s. This is largely due to a decline in POL’s reserves.

Over the same period, POL experienced a 16% decrease in its oil reserves and an 11% decrease in gas reserves.

These declines have had a direct impact on the company’s reserve life, shortening it considerably.

The decrease in reserves could be attributed to a combination of factors including mature fields, lack of new significant discoveries, and perhaps less aggressive exploration and development strategies compared to MARI.

The disparity in reserve life between MARI and POL highlights the importance of reserve management and growth.

MARI’s ability to not only maintain but grow its reserves speaks to its strong operational strategies and focus on exploration and development.

In contrast, POL faces challenges that may require a reassessment of its strategies to secure new reserves and extend its operational lifespan.

This positions MARI as a more resilient and potentially more profitable company in the long term, while POL may need to innovate and invest in exploration to remain competitive in the future.

⚠️ This post reflects the author’s personal opinion and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice. Investing involves risk and should be done independently. Read full disclaimer →